This week's readings addressed what had become my primary concern about writing instruction, and that is: editing instruction. I feel great - great, I tell you - about coaching students individually and as a class. But when I am removed from that equation and I am left with peers helping peers, well, what am I to do? Can I assume they will be able to help each other? These readings spoke to these concerns and ameliorated them to a certain degree.
First, I am quite sure that if I let them adrift into the Caspian Sea of writing without so much as a paddle, they will have no direction, become distracted and eventually start playing cribbage (provided they know how to play, happen to carry a travel-sized board on board and don't capsize in what can be a very rough sea). So, I know I have got to give them paddles, checklists, helpers, something to keep the editing process going. I liked VanDeWeghe's chart of peer response types, because I could show it to students and guide them toward the "reader's needs" and "writer's strategies" edits. I could also model such commentary individually and as a class. Additionally, I think it will be important to employ peer editing sheets to keep the process guided and on task, because chaos can really soak a great editing day.